First of all, Wikipedia is not an academic source, if you had any academc training or even any academic qualifications, you would know this. Secondly, it’s well established that he doesn’t speak, read or write Mandarin, nor does he speak, read or write Uyghur, which might have helped him understand more about the society he has vilified. His PhD is in anthropology and not based on Uyghurs, but based on the “Sinicization of Tibetenness in Qinghai” (sic) He does not speak, read or write Tibeten nor has he visited Tibet or Xinjiang — this hardly qualifies him to be an expert on either place and, in the opinion of many people, puts Cambridge University in an embarrassing position.

I am certain you will have more opinions to contradict me, but please don’t bother with opinions, or citations from either Wikipedia, or people quoting Zenz, which seems to be the only argument people have against me.

Prove me wrong by arguing your facts, if you can’t do that, then please don’t waste, my time, your time or my readers’ time